Extreme Thought!2 E = MC2 IS FLAWED Mr. Goofy Lee—How can you justify such an Extreme Theory!—that light does not travel at any speed, and that the concept of photon propagation is in error? You say you don't care who said it. But you know and everybody knows that Dr. Albert Einstein said it in 1905, a hundred years ago. Just who are you Sir, to despite such a science icon? If light does not travel, and there are no photons, then the velocity of light is zero. Then E = MC2 = 0. That is simple elementary algebra. This means that energy is zero, and only mass remains. Black mass I suppose you would speculate, Hee...Hee. Now you have explained Extreme! ...black holes, ...black matter, ...excuse me, ...dark matter? He...Hee...Hee. My Brother Homey Mathematician (BHM): Let me expound on what really makes the universe tick—Obviously something you've never heard—I'm going to blow your mind! Hee...Hee. Go on. Blow my mind Mister Goofy (MG), blow what is left of it after your first Extreme Thought!1 publication stating light does not travel and photons don't exist. That's correct BHM. No photons, no light, no photon travel, no light travel. Howbeit, we do have eyeballs, and we have eyeball lenses—the eyeball nerve path connects to the brain, then the noggin's neurological command signals, following onto biological muscular mechanisms that take calculated reactions in response to the gravitational flux universe. So responsive actions are initiated by what we call light, and our intelligent reactions are then controlled through our biological organs. You know this as well as I. We have perceived visible light as a narrow strip, sandwiched between the two invisible electromagnetic spectra. The full spectra extend from both the high and low ends of the visible spectrum, or on into the very long and very short invisible spectra until it vanishes into both extremities. Our intelligent life's instrumentation such as radio and astronomical antennae, telescopic lenses, photographs, and such mechanical concoctions, penetrate the invisible, and expands our vision throughout the electromagnetic spectra as it disappears into the extremities of zero and infinity sunsets. How beautiful! Hold on MG. I know about eyeballs, noggins, neurological paths, muscles, and the visible and invisible electromagnetic spectrum. I don't know what you are talking about when you say the gravitational flux universe. Is that what they use to call ether, that old and antiquated concept? And I question your conclusions of no photon and light travel. Einstein said it! Who are you to argue with Dr. Einstein, Mr. Goofy, MQ... er MG, ... whatever? Hold on a moment BHM. Can I just call you BH or BM or HM? And you call me MG without forgetting? BH is okay, but not BM, MG. I just don't like the smell .. er... the sound of BM. I could live with MG, but really I prefer BH, Brother Homey. Since we are friends and have such good exchange of communication, that's good. I don't like the idea of your equating me with mathematicians following the Pied Piper and the children to doom. Like Dr. Einstein is a pied piper. I get the picture, but it is not fair. You should apologize, MG. Okay BH, I apologize for all of that. You are my friend, and I need your talented help. I admit that sometimes I get off the track with my goofy style. But I love being goofy. I love to get off the track and try to be funny in the middle of a serious Extreme Thought! I've been just that way all through life, and all through my career as a rocket scientist. After hearing you complain, it might surprise you to know that I am an admirer of Dr. Einstein, and other great scientists. So right now I'll give you a serious summary and an equation defining the gravitational flux universe I envision from some of the same observations made by those great men and women. I assure you that I am not attempting to resurrect the ether concept as you infer. Okay? Okay MG. After that, Okay, I'm listening. But before you get into your serious summary, in a short statement, tell me what is light, if it's not photons? Well, from within the great matter magnitudes as galaxies, to within micro matter magnitudes such as molecular and subatomic particles, physical and chemical actions incite activity within an ever absorbing gravitational flux universe. Crest-by-crest in spherical geometry, such oscillations are relayed as radiance, outward into an ever-present ever-existing gravitational universe flux, that submerges the points of chemical and physical activity. As crest by crest of excited flux radiates and impacts the surface of proximity matter, the atomic or molecular surface of such proximity matter, absorbs the crest impact energy as to store it in a spring. After which crest by crest of the stored energy is released back into the flux universe, as crest by crest of the input flux relaxes. Thus with synchronous spring like responses, energy returns to the gravitational flux universe crests-by-crest. When the surface of your biological eyeball lens becomes the surface impacted by the oscillation of gravitational universe flux, the biological processes perform as described before. No photons. No light travel. No nonsense. When waves are incited in the ocean, water drops do not travel out from the point of incitation to the shoreline. Excitation energy is relayed crest to crest. It is just like the waves I stared at in the farm field rain puddles, when I was a little kid watching wave crest motions. Thanks MG. Now I see the gravitational flux waves with my eyeballs and noggin. Ha...Ha... Continue with the summary you promised, please! Okay, First BH: It is gravitational flux, not matter that defines and structures the universe. Wherever in the cosmos matter exists, active, reactive and interactive gravitational flux defines, constructs, destroys, redefines and reconstructs all matter/energy existence. The relative proximity, or distance between each bulk, each particle, and all plasma matter, existing in the past, in the present, and onto the future are derivative and reactive results of a universe of gravitational flux. Hold on, BH ... Excuse me... I see your expressions. Let me finish. Okay? Second: All perceivable or conceptual matter proximity existences, past, present and future, or changes in relative proximity of matter, whether cosmological, galactic, stellar, planetary bulk, planetary mineral, molecular structured, atomic or subatomic particles, are all derivatives of gravitational flux interactions on the outer surface, the inner surface, and inner volume of all such defined and integrated masses. Third: All past, and future physical proximity, and all momentary changes in physical proximity of matter, all chemical or mineral actions and reactions, and all biological actions and reactions, are derivatives of and are controlled by laws of the gravitational flux universe. Gravitational flux universe derivatives provide the solution in search for the unified electromagnetic field theory. Fourth: It is likely that what intelligent life has perceived as human soul and spirit in the past, now perceives in the present, and to be perceived in the future, has been encased in DNA biological structure as knowledge of rights that are derivatives whereby intelligent life perceives and interacts with matter within the gravitational flux universe. That's heavy stuff MG. I have to ponder over it. But MG. I know that you are not trying to dodge my question? You have not answered my question about E = MC2. You have speculated on how light does not travel, and how photons do not exist. If no C, then no E. How do you explain that? Bear with me BHM. What I say is not to be lightly taken, ... or taken light? ... I say lightly taken. Confusing English, ain't it. But what I say is the correct insight as to what makes our universe tick. You know, like tick tock of the clock? Like for example, time may be simultaneously real, arbitrary, imaginary, but still a handy dandy invention by us, intelligent life. Or like the geometric shapes we perceive,. like space lengths are an intelligent life invention. But at this point in my Extreme Thought!, it's too early to make a swing at the whole centimeter, gram, second (cgs) standards. I might even warp and blow my own space mind. But. Okay... Okay... You are edgy. Before we get to E = MC2, let me say this much more about gravitational flux. In defining the matter segments of itself, the gravitational flux universe is more sensitive and complex in its responses and interactions with mass than could be conceptualized by Newton, Einstein, Maxwell and others. Gravity's function in planetary orbits around the sun provided an overt and easy mimic to conceptualize the atomic structure, with electrons revolving around a nucleus. You may also describe the atomic structure as some fixed multiplane geometric, if you had freedom from not being laughed at, HB. You can model atomic structure as a pliable springy multiplane crystal, where no atomic spinning is required. Then keep your photon, if you wish, as the vibrant energy exchange between one face of this atomic crystal, in relay to a nearby adjacent atom's crystal face, or back into the gravitational flux universe. No electron circling nor spinning, nor moving, nor engaged in proximity shifts, until excited into springing reaction by the rippling gravitational flux universe. The orbital concepts, and the force between proximity matter concepts of gravity by Newton may be limiting, and may be blocking advances of intelligent life's understanding of atomic structure and the true nature of matter's submersion into the gravitational flux universe. This is goofy, but, at some points, past and present conceptions seem not to confirm new or present perceptions. I repeat. The world is not now flat. Likely, the world was never flat. Will it ever be flat? Chuckle...chuckle. We don't really know what will happen after we suck all the oil out the ground and burn it, and create the ultimate pancake effect of global warming. Do we BH? Chuckle. Chuckle. Like baking a pancake on a hot grill. Get it BH? ... Ha... Ha. ! Global warming, hot grill, pancake effect, flatten globe, flat earth? Ha... Ha...Why are you frowning BH? Hee. Hee. Look MG. I get it! I get it! It's not that funny. I'm thinking of this no photon thing you are saying. How can there be light if there are no photons? Seriously BH. First, universal gravitational flux does in fact interacts with a specific matter configured concoction we call closed photo electric effect circuits. This concocted wired circuitry is polarized, whereby direct electric current flows within such circuits, and we call this the photoelectric effect. This is an amazing interaction with the surface of this material, excited by the rippling gravitational flux universe interaction on the surface of sensitive and responsive material matter. Notice I didn't say photon sensitive circuit concoction, BH. I know. I heard that. I'm still listening for what else you have to say, MG. You know this also BH. Gravitational flux does in fact, interact with the specific matter concocted configurations we call grates, and thereby produce shadow rings, conceptualized as caused by light waveform from two sources, cancelling or enforcing each other. Again this is an amazing physical performance by the gravitational flux universe, interacting with another of intelligent life's concoctions, the grate. The grate may be... er... two holes punched into one wall side of a closed box. The shadow rings appear on the wall side opposite to where the two holes are punched. The waves, not photon waves, but gravitational flux waves, amplify or cancel each other, from one hole to the next, on the opposite side wall of the box. Your description rambles a bit MG. But I see it.. Go on, make your point. A conceptual explanation for the first phenomenon, the shamming, er... er... slamming into our concocted circuit material phenomenon, is that weightless photons, traveling all the way from the sun, at light speed, or from some other photon source at light speed, such as from a nearby electric lighted bulb, or... or... a burning match. These photons slam into a photoelectric material, like... like... that dark looking bar, on your pocket calculator. This creates an electrical potential and current, keeping the calculator electric energy up, or the battery charged... Photons! Traveling at light speed! Slamming into my pocket calculator! No way that's photons, BH. Gravitational flux was sitting there all the time, just waiting to be excited into a gentle rippling electromagnetic wave, relayed from our light bulb excitation, a short distance away, or from our sun, a far away distant star. This is the gravitational flux universe in action and reaction. How magnificent BH! How beautiful! Just like the waves I gazed at in the rain puddles, when I was a little kid. Read my autobiography again, BH. One of the infinity of mathematically formulated models, describing gravitational flux propagation and surface interaction, is presented as surface ocean gravity waves on page 361 of my API Physics reference book. The grating phenomenon is no sham, BH. Here, through two holes on one side of a closed box, the gravitational flux universe exposes one of its most telling and marvelous perceptional phenomena, wave enhancement and cancellation. Since gravitational flux exist everywhere as it defines our universe, neither the zipping of photons from the sun, nor photons from the nearby electric light bulb, are required for gravitational flux interaction, action or reaction. Gravitational flux excitation described as the sun's excitation brilliance, is relayed in wave relay format, into our intelligent box grate configuration. Massless speedy particles dubbed photons, zipping through space as light and at light speed is a misconception of nature. Universal gravitational flux is neither aligned to, nor otherwise attached to any fixed vector origin or scalar continuum, just as a binary clock on the hard drive of a computer is not enslaved. Universal gravitational flux reconstructs its own universal mass/energy proximity at a clock pulse rate above the yottayotta hertz square wave bit rate. The mass/energy excitation function operates such as to create interactive proximity derivative modulation onto the gravity flux universe clock, thus structuring intelligent life's mathematical concepts, to be confirmed by experimental testing, then useful application. Mass/energy proximity modulations in the clock's hertz ranges extend from shorter than yottayotta hertz square wave bits, to longer than yoctoyocto hertz square wave bits. With this range in clock bit rate, and with gravitational flux not aligned to any scalar or vector origin, math models of periodic proximity cycles of mass can be devised from above yottayotta hertz bit rates, to below yoctoyocto hertz bit rates. This highest and lowest bit rate is strategically chosen such that the shortest and the longest of harmonic proximity derivatives may be modulated into the gravitational clock bit wave train. This would include periodic and or random perceptions of matter proximity variations within and between the galactic systems, as well as variation in molecular, atomic, subatomic particle and plasma matter modules. As a real derivative generator of sub universal matter components, the central and master gravitational flux universe clock, also creates our perception of static electric fields, permanent magnetic fields, and all electromagnetic phenomena modeled in Maxwell's equations. Are you beginning to see what I'm saying about the gravitational flux universe BH? MG I am beginning to become impressed, even as I am not instantly convinced that what you say makes all the sense in the world. You claim to see a dynamic gravitational flux defining the universe, and gravity as not being a stagnant stand by responder in proximity derivatives of mass. Like in E = MC2 or like in the movie "What The Bleep Do We Know". A most unlikely story, that is. The shaman saw ships that nobody else could see, until he pointed to the ships. I think that is the sort of weird position you put yourself in, MG. Another thing. I gather MG, is that you have picked a higher than yottayotta hertz binary clock reference, so as to be able to synchronize, modulate and harmonize all the matter activities in the universe, from galactic down to the smallest highly energetic plasma particles. I agree with that. As a carrier, such a clock could support base controller operatives to perform all possible Boolean functions by dynamic matter proximity modulations. Since you really don't have a basis for being exact about the clock rate, you cover all possible spectra, throughout the visible and throughout both ends of the invisible segment. You can relate the cyclic periodicity of planets, moons and comets, and of masses from galaxies to sub electrons to gravitational flux universe control. That's cool. Wopee! MG. You start me to dreaming of creating mathematical models using such operatives as factorials, integrations, trigonometric and inverse trigonometric functions, inverse and straight hyperbolic functions, gamma functions, orthogonal coordinate systems, Fourier series and Fourier transforms, Laplace transforms and some creative operatives of my own dubbed "BH operatives and functions". Ha...Ha... You excite me, MG. BH, it seems that you as a mathematician have followed and understand what you call my gibberish, and you have made a good suggestion about developing the concept models through use of high math methodology and operatives. Your mind is flashing about whether we should review and rewrite the whole book. You see. What I have conceived as Mr. Goofy is the groundwork for new real systems applications in the gravitational flux universe. Along with the Boolean binary system, and a yottayotta hertz clock gravitational flux computer simulator, you can conceptualize and math model the modulated gravity flux stream as the driver in a feedback control system, like in electrical engineering control system design and mechanization. We might need help from the electrical engineering disciplines for this. The synergy spectrum of talents, you know. Together we might model the reactive control systems design with gravitational flux modulation excitation as the principal input to control derivatives in bulk mass proximity with time and dimensions. We really should try to get some prestigious university to grant us a fellowship to work out all this out. We might even win the Nobel Prize next year. That would be really cool MH. Dream on Homey. However before we go into this higher math you referenced, and into my applications systems concept, some of which I am slow in developing, let's start with the basics of grade school algebra in the E = MC2S equation. Okay? Alright MG. In some of your coming Extreme Thoughts! I promise to follow your concept with higher math operatives, Mr. PP (Pied Piper). Okay? BH. That Mr. PP is not fair to turn on me. But let's flip to the near first pages in a basic middle school algebra book for this E = MC2 bit. First let's divide both sides of the equation E = MC2 by the mass, M. Then, the energy to mass ratio is, E/M = C2 = (9x1010 meters/second)2 = 8.1x1021 meters/sec x meters/sec. So, then the universal matter energy ratio, E/M, is mathematically constant. It is the same forever and ever. This constant C2, equates to all the energy/mass in the universe. And if C2 is taken literately algebraically, then the universe of energy/mass may be geometrically described as distributed in many fashions, such as a flat two side area (meters x meters), with sides not necessarily with the same velocity (meters/second x meters/second). Or another model of the universe could be described as two separate linear dimensions, meters and meters, attached simultaneously in unity acceleration of seconds times seconds with no vector direction, nor reference. Then both lines may be imagined as separate, unattached, even perhaps with independent velocity magnitudes and/or vector, in meters per second, and as not having a common vector origin, with different vector and/or scalar velocity magnitudes. With this freedom to model, BH, you can model me warped, stringed, relativistic, and many other clever imaginations of how the gravitational flux universe is shaped, moves and ticks. But only in your nightmare dreams can you ever imagine, such mangled realities in nature. However you would be free to describe geometrically a universal configuration as contorted, warped or string tied together space. Hee...Hee... It would allow for synchronous and/or harmonic compensating changes in the E/M ratio, approaching zero/zero or infinity/infinity for the energy/mass ratio magnitudes. Mathematically in chain reaction, such a basic Pied Piper following, can lead to infinite sidetracks. How can you instrument for no relativity and perceptional response, when something is forever equated to a constant, never changing from C2? But Goofy, Sir! Dr. Einstein's relativity has little or nothing to do with the equation E = MC2! And. Are you goofing string theory? You must be confused, MG! I hear what you are saying BH. I am not confused. I am not talking about either Einstein's relativity, or the string theory, just yet. I am using simple grade school algebraic analysis. What I am saying is that if you want to prove or disprove this most important conceptual equation, E = MC2, you must be able to express the equation in differential equation format, to conceptually accept and experimentally test it, if you intend to analyze differential relative proximity in the gravitational flux universe. That's freshman college math. You can see that E/M is changing every instant of time. Such as when you set by a campfire, or light up a firecracker on the fourth of July. You need differential instrumentation to measure and verify the difference in mass, and energy before and after the mass to energy transformation, and vise versa. Like in an Extreme! and goofy experiment, you would explode an atomic bomb, measure and compare both every yocto gram of mass, and every yocto erg of energy, before and after the blast. Rather expensive, unsafe and insane isn' t it. Not recommended. Or simpler and safer, equate both the yocto gram and erg differentials of a nuclear power plant before and after the generation of some number of yotta watts of electricity. BH, have you seen or do you know of any such precise experiments? Okay. Okay. Don't answer me, BH. However the Guinness book of records, reports that micro nanogram weights are measurable by highly skilled personnel, using extremely delicate balancing instrumentation. In a controlled adiabatic environment, such personnel could verify E/M exchange differentials, relative to environmental temperature differentials and weight change differentials in a radioactive materials environment. This might be a less risky yet safe, but expensive test. But I don't want to be detracted by such details just yet. I want to get to the Goofy side of me, now and fast. Are you falling to sleep BHM? Not yet, MQ. er G. that is MG. Then I continue. You are a true blue American, true black, brown, white, red, yellow, or somewhere in between true mixed colored Americans. You love baseball, football, basketball, tennis, golf, foot racing, car racing, apple pie or something like all of them or none of them. That covers just about all colored Americans and all other colored peoples of the world. But I can' t possibility please everybody in the world. So let me pick a sport. .hum.. baseball or tennis, either one or both. And out of baseball history per the Guinness book, let me pick ...hum. ..hum.. the speed of a pitched fast ball of Satchel Page, or ..hum..hum. the grand slam speed of tennis legion Althea Gibson, and a golf ball driven with a fifteen iron club by legendary golfer Bob Hope. .. ?? Is there a fifteen iron club in golf BH? No MG. The biggest iron is the nine iron. That's funny. Then how could Hope use a fifteen iron against the tiger in the woods... er...er, on the green ... er...er Tiger Woods? Man. You are not being goofy. You are being insane. What does such ball speed have to do with E = MC2? That's my point BH. ... Nothing. What does the speed of so called photons, of light, have to do with how the universe ticks? ... Same answer ... Nothing. Let me continue making my analogy. You know, free speech! So in Guiness Book of Records, if you take the average speed of all these balls, it is something like 125.936 miles per hour. Or when rounded off it is 126 miles per hour or 3.5x10-2 miles per second. ......Now the speed of light C is assumed to be 1.86 x 105 miles per second, and with the average ball speed as rounded off is 3.5x10-2 miles per second.... (Let's notate ball speed as ....(bs)). Excuse my mumbling BH.....Then (bs)2 equals 12.25x10-4 miles2/sec2. Now to equate C2 to (bs)2, we use the equation C2= N2(bs)2. Inserting the proper values C2 and (bs)2 into this equation results in a constant value of N2 = 2.78x1014 . Let's call N the Goofy constant. N is typed in Jokerman font, you might notice. Now we have E = MN2(bs)2, as a substitute for E = MC2. Now we use the Goofy equation E = MN2(bs)2 . Right? Isn't that cool, BH? Oh Lord! Please don't ask me to check your Jokerman math MG. So go on quick . or go away quicker. .. please! Oh Lord! But BH. Both equations give identical and just as accurate, but just as irrelevant result. And both have nothing to do with how nature ticks and tocks the universe. Check my Jokerman math for me Homey. Please! Use my equation, and instead of the speed of photon balls, use the speed of tennis balls, or golf balls, or to be fair like I am. Average the speed of your choice of balls out, and make your Goofy equation number M. You crack me up MG! Like. .. Ha .Ha. But get a little serious with me now, Dr. Goffy. You have made fun of light traveling, photons and E = MC2 . Now how would you say that the universe ticks and tocks by the gravitational flux universe model, and with its yottayotta hertz clock, and with the feedback control system modeling, involving human intelligence and human spirit? If you go so far as you have, what would you say about quantum theory and relativity? Quantum theory and relativity? Later Extreme Thought! BH. Not now, but later. Right now let's summarize universal gravitational flux. In summary, universal gravitational flux has total and complete determination of any and all universal matter proximity and proximity divergences. This is true on the atomic and molecular surfaces of bulk matter, as well as within the inner or enclosed volume of all that is now or ever will be perceived by intelligent life as volume. Unexcited by neither chemical reaction, nor proximity changes, the gravitational flux universe is not evident and cannot be perceived unrelated to matter. Such perceptions of spectra as fixed and permanent electric or magnetic, and electromagnetic field, are in fact derivatives of universal gravitational flux in excitation. As an integrator, universal gravitational flux unifies all electric and magnetic field interactions. More than likely, in the future, the spectra of human soul and spirit will be discovered as a derivative of the gravitational flux universe, precisely defined, and understood as a natural endowment, with limited biological divergence, wound into human DNA structure. Oh Lord, MG. Your being serious disturbs me. Give me the equation you promised. At least give me something to start working with, so I can help you out of your sickness. And don't be goofy anymore. At least not in this issue of Extreme Thought! Alright. I promise to not be goofy anymore at this time. I could seriously start off with a second order differential equation incorporating gravitational flux with Maxwell's and Newton's equations. That would constitute unifying the gravitational flux universe with electromagnetic phenomenon, or field theory. If you wish, you and I can do it together. I'd like that. If not, I can do it alone, and be more serious about it than I was about the (bs) factor. You would like that. So here is the equation by Newton, Maxwell, Coulomb and me, MG. F = hM1M2/R2 +G1+G2+ G3 = [hM1M2/R2 + q1q2/er2 + m1m2/ms2 +S(knsinwnt + kmcosxmt)] In my equation segment hM1M2/R2, M1 and M2 are masses emerged in the gravitational flux universe having h as the gravitational constant, with masses separated by the proximity R. This is Newton's law of universal gravitation. G1 = q1q1/er2, Coulomb's law, is the force exerted between the static electric charges q1 and q2, emerged in the gravitational flux universe with the physical constant e, separated by the proximity r. G2 = m1m2/ms2 is the force exerted between two permanent magnetic poles m1 and m2, emerged in the gravitational flux with the physical constant m, separated by the proximity s. G3 = S(knsinwnt + kmcosxmt) is the sum of the sinusoidal components w and x in the gravitational flux excitation with physical constants n and m. G3 = is the resultant summation of the gravitational flux universe's response to surface impact of flux wave motion on either of the bodies M1 or M2 dependant upon which body is under consideration. Such flux modulations are not restricted to flux oscillations being incited by the subject bodies, but also flux modulations of the local environment. No photon. No light travel. That's it for this time BH. Think about what we have discussed, and we will hash some of it out together on our next Extreme Thought! Extreme Thought! is a recurring publication of mortonette.com. "GOOFY LEE" |